Soft Works (HE12025-02-21): > Yes, this is all true, but of course I did a diff to current ffprobe code and > the number of bugfixes is exactly zero.
I did a diff to see if what I suspected was duplicated code was indeed, and I found it was, and I found failures of synchronization too. > Strictly speaking, it's not a duplication because one part lives only > In ffprobe and the other only in ffmpeg. That is irrelevant, you copy-pasted code, that is code duplication. > When I had submitted this patchset in 2021, you had said the same > thing, Well, unless I was not paying attention, the same flaws lead to the same comments. > that you want to work on it, but now it's 4 years later and > it hasn't happened. Indeed. “It hasn't happened” is kind of what you should expect when a prerequisite is being blocked. > But this can't be a blocker. You cannot be blocked until the code I had baking is included, but your code duplication is still a big no, and a big no is blocking. Regards, -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
