Hi James

On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 11:46:32AM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  tests/fate/libswresample.mak       | 8 ++++++++
>  tests/filtergraphs/custom_rematrix | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tests/filtergraphs/custom_rematrix
> 
> diff --git a/tests/fate/libswresample.mak b/tests/fate/libswresample.mak
> index a1e5ab91fa..aa4438a4bd 100644
> --- a/tests/fate/libswresample.mak
> +++ b/tests/fate/libswresample.mak
> @@ -1097,5 +1097,13 @@ fate-swr-audioconvert: CMP = stddev
>  fate-swr-audioconvert: FUZZ = 0
>  
>  FATE_SWR += $(FATE_SWR_AUDIOCONVERT-yes)
> +
> +FATE_SWR_CUSTOM_REMATRIX-$(call FILTERDEMDECENCMUX, ARESAMPLE CHANNELMAP 
> AFORMAT, WAV, PCM_S16LE, PCM_S16LE, PCM_S16LE) += fate-swr-custom-rematrix
> +fate-swr-custom-rematrix: tests/data/asynth-44100-8.wav 
> tests/data/filtergraphs/custom_rematrix
> +fate-swr-custom-rematrix: CMD = md5 -i 
> $(TARGET_PATH)/tests/data/asynth-44100-8.wav -/filter_complex 
> $(TARGET_PATH)/tests/data/filtergraphs/custom_rematrix -map [OUT] -f s16le
> +fate-swr-custom-rematrix: CMP = oneline
> +fate-swr-custom-rematrix: REF = 2a14a44deb4ae26e3b474ddbfbc048f8

not a huge fan of md5 based testing of downmixing as it provides just a
"same" vs "different"

but patch ok

thx

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

There will always be a question for which you do not know the correct answer.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to