On 23.01.2025 15:17, Zhao Zhili wrote:
From: Zhao Zhili <zhiliz...@tencent.com>
Otherwise all frames can be dropped after seek without the
output_corrupt/showall flags.
---
libavcodec/nvenc.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/libavcodec/nvenc.c b/libavcodec/nvenc.c
index 06e3fb81a4..68b1b661e4 100644
--- a/libavcodec/nvenc.c
+++ b/libavcodec/nvenc.c
@@ -1247,6 +1247,7 @@ static av_cold int nvenc_setup_h264_config(AVCodecContext
*avctx)
h264->intraRefreshPeriod = cc->gopLength;
h264->intraRefreshCnt = cc->gopLength - 1;
cc->gopLength = NVENC_INFINITE_GOPLENGTH;
+ h264->outputRecoveryPointSEI = 1;
#ifdef NVENC_HAVE_SINGLE_SLICE_INTRA_REFRESH
h264->singleSliceIntraRefresh = ctx->single_slice_intra_refresh;
#endif
@@ -1380,6 +1381,7 @@ static av_cold int nvenc_setup_hevc_config(AVCodecContext
*avctx)
hevc->intraRefreshPeriod = cc->gopLength;
hevc->intraRefreshCnt = cc->gopLength - 1;
cc->gopLength = NVENC_INFINITE_GOPLENGTH;
+ hevc->outputRecoveryPointSEI = 1;
#ifdef NVENC_HAVE_SINGLE_SLICE_INTRA_REFRESH
hevc->singleSliceIntraRefresh = ctx->single_slice_intra_refresh;
#endif
Is there any reason someone might not want this?
Or could it break certain scenarios?
Reads to me like it'd only make the bitstream slightly larger, or are
there other implications?
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".