Michael Niedermayer (12025-01-21): > Being a "member of the commuity" should give them a vote if you want to > call it a democracy in relation to the FFmpeg community
At this point I think it would be very useful if you took the time to write down the reasons you think this whole thing is a good idea. I mean, explain, with simple practical considerations and low-level principles of ethics, avoiding emotionally-loaded words like “democracy”, why you think that somebody should have a say in the future of FFmpeg just because they read the mailing-list, and for that matter, why you think somebody who has been managing assembly for a specific arch for six months and will leave in a few more months when a new jobs opportunity appears should have as much say as somebody who wrote a significant fraction of the code and has been here for more than a decade and intends to stay and fix bugs and add features in any part of the code base. Regards, -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
