Hello, in the context of a GA member, I think there is general interest in modernizing technical tooling specifically regarding ML/patch workflow vs. integrated git solution. Both have their merits. I think what we have today is optimized for some but cumbersome for many. Like shopping for a drill, it is good to step back from time to time and ensure we have the right tools.
I think the problem statement of productivity being impacted from outgrowing the current tooling is different from who is hosting it. These are some options I noticed interest in (in no particular order): - Forgejo - GitLab - Mailing List/Patch Workflow (current solution) If we evaluate this as choosing a software appliance and put aside "who is the host" I think we can have a good discussion. There could be value in coming to consensus on one step, then moving on to the next. The goal is not to spin around on which tool is better but I am wondering, - What other options would the community consider and any relevant pros/cons? - What are the next steps to make a path forward on this topic such as a vote? - What are the blockers and how can they be overcome? - If you feel very strongly about a particular tool that is not well received, what about it do you like and are there accommodations that can be made from the other options? Wishing for a healthy discussion. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
