On 2025-01-20 11:14 pm, Soft Works wrote:
- An indication that the aim and direction of the contribution is
generally acceptable
This the crux of the matter. There appear to be two camps at odds with
one another:
1) a conservative camp which wants to avoid features or changes which
don't neatly fit within a conventional pure architecture with clear
separation of roles and duties, or features which are of use only to
some users
and,
2) a broadband camp which accepts features which are niche or which
require some hybrid accommodation in its implementation.
For most of ffmpeg history, the latter has been the dominant camp. But
not in recent history.
Tweaking the structures or procedures of governance can't ultimately
bridge this chasm. It's almost like these camps should be part of
different projects.
Regards,
Gyan
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
