On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 4:02 AM Leo Izen <leo.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/16/24 5:50 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > > (c): implement enough of zlib ourselfs, so it can encode to a valid output > > A reimplementation of zlib that does nothing except for fixing FATE > failures that shouldn't be failing anyway sounds like a security > vulnerability waiting to happen. Stock maddler's zlib still has > vulnerabilities occur and there's the whole world's eyes on it. This > sounds like a bad idea.
I think the keyword from "implement enough of zlib ourselfs" is "enough", in this case for uncompressed data. IIRC it's just 5 bytes + uncompressed data for each chunk, which should be pretty simple. I also don't think we should aim to reimplement zlib. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
