On Sun, 17 Nov 2024, 10:03 Anton Khirnov, <an...@khirnov.net> wrote:
> Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-11-17 01:42:20)
> > I think this would work better than TC or nothing process.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc>
> > ---
> > doc/developer.texi | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/doc/developer.texi b/doc/developer.texi
> > index 78053a4623a..2af71ed749a 100644
> > --- a/doc/developer.texi
> > +++ b/doc/developer.texi
> > @@ -937,6 +937,9 @@ The developers maintaining each part of the codebase
> are listed in @file{MAINTAI
> > Being listed in @file{MAINTAINERS}, gives one the right to have git
> write access to
> > the specific repository.
> >
> > +In actively maintained areas, the maintainer has the last word in case
> of a technical disagreement.
>
> Strongly against. It would lead to the project partitioning into walled
> gardens each with its own inconsistent set of rules.
>
+1
>
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
