Le lauantaina 16. marraskuuta 2024, 16.39.29 EET James Almer a écrit :
> > This a large proportion of values to underflow or overflow out of the int
> > range. The C version then triggers Undefined Behaviour in that case by
> > negating INT_MIN, so I don't suppose that that's correct.
> 
> So is the C version broken, or this test's randomized values?

The C code ostensibly does not expect those values, but regardless I don't 
know if they can be triggered or not.

So I don't know if it's a bug in this patch, a bug in the C code or both.

-- 
雷米‧德尼-库尔蒙
http://www.remlab.net/



_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to