Hi,
thanks for adding the test! This looks pretty good. Minor suggestion:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 5:39 PM Kyosuke Kawakami <kawakami150...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +#define RANDOMIZE_DESTS(name, size) \
> + do { \
> + int i; \
> + for (i = 0; i < size; ++i) { \
> + uint16_t r = rnd(); \
> + AV_WN16A(name##0 + i, r); \
> + AV_WN16A(name##1 + i, r); \
> + } \
> + } while (0)
> +
> +#define RANDOMIZE_BUFFER8(name, size) \
> + do { \
> + int i; \
> + for (i = 0; i < size; ++i) { \
> + uint8_t r = rnd(); \
> + name[i] = r; \
> + } \
> + } while (0)
> +
> +#define OBMC_STRIDE 32
> +
> +#define CHECK_ADD_OBMC(func_index, yblen, xblen)
> \
> + static void check_add_obmc ## xblen(void)
> \
> + {
> \
> + LOCAL_ALIGNED_8(uint8_t, src, [yblen * xblen]);
> \
> + LOCAL_ALIGNED_16(uint16_t, dst0, [yblen * xblen]);
> \
> + LOCAL_ALIGNED_16(uint16_t, dst1, [yblen * xblen]);
> \
> + LOCAL_ALIGNED_8(uint8_t, obmc_weight, [yblen * OBMC_STRIDE]);
> \
> + DiracDSPContext h;
> \
> + ff_diracdsp_init(&h);
> \
> + if (check_func(h.add_dirac_obmc[func_index],
> "diracdsp.add_dirac_obmc_%d", xblen)) { \
> + declare_func(void, uint16_t*, const uint8_t*, int, const
> uint8_t *, int); \
> + RANDOMIZE_BUFFER8(src, yblen * xblen);
> \
> + RANDOMIZE_DESTS(dst, yblen * xblen);
> \
> + RANDOMIZE_BUFFER8(obmc_weight, yblen * OBMC_STRIDE);
> \
> + call_ref(dst0, src, xblen, obmc_weight, yblen);
> \
> + call_new(dst1, src, xblen, obmc_weight, yblen);
> \
> + if (memcmp(dst0, dst1, yblen * xblen))
> \
> + fail();
> \
> + bench_new(dst1, src, xblen, obmc_weight, yblen);
> \
> + }
> \
> + }
> \
> +
> +CHECK_ADD_OBMC(0, 64, 8)
> +CHECK_ADD_OBMC(1, 64, 16)
> +CHECK_ADD_OBMC(2, 64, 32)
> +
> +void checkasm_check_diracdsp(void)
> +{
> + check_add_obmc8();
> + check_add_obmc16();
> + check_add_obmc32();
> + report("diracdsp");
> +}
>
In terms of binary size, the above will triplicate nearly identical code in
the binary, and that doesn't really seem necessary. You should be able to
write the above out as a function and call it with appropriate xblen and
func_index arguments (check_add_obmc(0, 8); check_add_obmc(1, 16);
check_add_obmc(2, 32)) without duplicating these in the binary. Done for
many tests, this reduces binary size and compile time significantly.
You can also get bonus points if you randomize yblen, since the bitstream
allows multiple values for this (at least 4, 12, 16, 24, but possibly any
number), so maybe 1 + (random % 64) would be a good choice?
If you don't care for the above, we can merge this as-is, they're merely
suggestions, let me know what you think.
Ronald
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
