On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 12:11:49AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi all > > Should libpostproc be split out into a seperate source repository ? > > Several people did over the years want libpostproc removed, and such > a task was part of the submitted and approved STF 2024 projects. > But when i recently started posting related work, tomas questioned > if spliting libpostproc into a seperate source repository actually is a good > idea. > > No invoice was submitted yet, so we could likely still change > this to something else, if thats what people prefer. > > To clarify this a bit (as its a bit convoluted) > Option A. > 1. split libpostproc out so it builds and links fine (already done) (send > to SPI/STF/Invoice in future) > 2. develop test system for libpostproc (2024 future) (send to > SPI/STF/Invoice in future) > 3. actually remove libpostproc from master repository (2025 future) (send > to SPI/STF/Invoice in future)
to clarify this, because i guess one can misunderstand this. libpostproc at this would be maintained in a seperate source repository and FFmpeg will of course continue to support linking and using that external libpostproc I do intend to maintain libpostproc, and would certainly be happy about every contribution. (A new API would be needed so a wider range of libavfilter features are available in libpostproc) thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB The real ebay dictionary, page 2 "100% positive feedback" - "All either got their money back or didnt complain" "Best seller ever, very honest" - "Seller refunded buyer after failed scam"
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
