On 11/7/2024 6:02 AM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024, James Almer wrote:

ffmpeg | branch: master | James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> | Sat Nov  2 20:06:24 2024 -0300| [271aea60a4cd211d92923c53b72cd074c3030897] | committer: James Almer

fate/pixfmts: extend the high bit depth test

Also test 8bit formats, and try bitdepth conversion paths.

Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com>

http://git.videolan.org/gitweb.cgi/ffmpeg.git/? a=commit;h=271aea60a4cd211d92923c53b72cd074c3030897
---

Some of the new tests included here fail on a number of systems - in practice, I don't see any fully passing configuration at http:// fate.ffmpeg.org/?sort=descdate.

The ones that only have a few test failures fail pixfmt-yuv444p12-yuv444p.

All other (both x86, arm and aarch64) fail on these tests:

pixfmt-gbrp10-nv12
pixfmt-gbrp10-nv24
pixfmt-gbrp12-nv12
pixfmt-gbrp12-nv24
pixfmt-rgb48-nv12
pixfmt-rgb48-nv24
pixfmt-yuv444p10-nv12
pixfmt-yuv444p10-nv24
pixfmt-yuv444p12-nv12
pixfmt-yuv444p12-nv24
pixfmt-yuv444p12-yuv444p

(When I see failures in these tests x86, that's on an old machine that lacks AVX2.)

I don't know what's going on. I tried on mingw-w64 and Ubuntu x86_64 22.04 and i get no failures, with CPUFLAGS=0, CPUFLAGS=mmx+mmxext, or CPUFLAGS=all (avx2).

I see all x86 systems in FATE failing on fate-pixfmt-yuv444p12-yuv444p, but i can't reproduce it.

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to