On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 07:56:29PM -0300, James Almer wrote: > On 10/25/2024 7:18 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 04:36:44PM -0300, James Almer wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> > > > --- > > > libswscale/output.c | 37 +++++++++++++++--------- > > > libswscale/utils.c | 4 +-- > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixdesc-xv48be | 1 + > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixdesc-xv48le | 1 + > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-copy | 2 ++ > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-crop | 2 ++ > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-field | 2 ++ > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-fieldorder | 2 ++ > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-hflip | 2 ++ > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-il | 2 ++ > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-null | 2 ++ > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-scale | 2 ++ > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-transpose | 2 ++ > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-vflip | 2 ++ > > > 14 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/filter-pixdesc-xv48be > > > create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/filter-pixdesc-xv48le > > > > didnt apply cleanly so no test but LGTM > > > > thx > > It was Niklas recent renaming patch. You can try a rebased version in
> https://github.com/jamrial/FFmpeg/commits/pixdesc/ thanks, that helped, swscale patches seem turning stale within the 500ms transit time to the ML the swscale changes in that branch look good tests seems passing on mingw32/64 linux x86-32/64 and mips thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Opposition brings concord. Out of discord comes the fairest harmony. -- Heraclitus
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
