Quoting Marton Balint (2024-10-22 20:35:52)
>
>
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2024, Anton Khirnov wrote:
>
> > Quoting Martin Schitter (2024-10-21 21:57:18)
> >> +static int pass_through(AVCodecContext *avctx, AVFrame *frame, const
> >> AVPacket *avpkt)
> >> +{
> >> + /* there is no need to copy as the data already match
> >> + * a known pixel format */
> >> +
> >> + frame->buf[0] = av_buffer_ref(avpkt->buf);
> >
> > I said this twice before already - every single format that uses
> > pass_through() should instead be exported by the demuxer as
> > AV_CODEC_ID_RAWVIDEO, because that's what it is.
>
> I don't really want the MXF demuxer/muxer to do DNXUC parsing
What parsing is there to do? You just compare against the codec tag.
> Also I might want to wrap DNXUC essence to another container, or remux
> it to MXF again.
And where is the problem here?
> So I am not convinced that the current approach is bad.
It is bad because it introduces a completely pointless and arbitrary
distinction between "rawvideo" and "rawvideo, but EXTRACTED FROM MXF".
And also because of the two points I mentioned:
> > * decoding these formats won't pointlessly waste resources and add
> > latency using frame threading, which is useless for them
> > * your decoder can be marked as AV_CODEC_CAP_DR1
--
Anton Khirnov
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
