On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:30:45AM +0100, Sven Dueking wrote: > From: Sven Dueking <s...@nablet.com> > > --- > libavcodec/qsvenc.c | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/libavcodec/qsvenc.c b/libavcodec/qsvenc.c > index 57f5fe4..b56e4b4 100644 > --- a/libavcodec/qsvenc.c > +++ b/libavcodec/qsvenc.c > @@ -118,10 +118,14 @@ static int init_video_param(AVCodecContext *avctx, > QSVEncContext *q) > > switch (q->param.mfx.RateControlMethod) { > case MFX_RATECONTROL_CBR: > + q->param.mfx.InitialDelayInKB = avctx->rc_initial_buffer_occupancy / > 1000; > + q->param.mfx.TargetKbps = avctx->bit_rate / 1000; > + q->param.mfx.MaxKbps = avctx->bit_rate / 1000; > + break; > case MFX_RATECONTROL_VBR: > q->param.mfx.InitialDelayInKB = avctx->rc_initial_buffer_occupancy / > 1000; > q->param.mfx.TargetKbps = avctx->bit_rate / 1000; > - q->param.mfx.MaxKbps = avctx->bit_rate / 1000; > + q->param.mfx.MaxKbps = avctx->rc_max_rate / 1000;
why is rc_max_rate not used for MFX_RATECONTROL_CBR ? [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB There will always be a question for which you do not know the correct answer.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel