On 2024-10-18 16:36 +0200, Lynne via ffmpeg-devel wrote: > On 18/10/2024 14:41, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 2:09 PM Alexander Strasser via ffmpeg-devel > > <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > > This caused differences > > > with 2 fate tests depending on the zlib version used. > > > > 2 fate tests? > > https://fate.ffmpeg.org/report.cgi?time=20241016173824&slot=x86_32-msvc14-dll-md-windows-native > > > > This entire approach feels extremely brittle for the future. > > > > - Hendrik > > Yeah, definitely. > These days, other libraries like miniz are getting used as well, so > hardcoding each case separately is no better than what we have currently.
Hmm not sure about the build from Hendrik. This was with a build with zlib and compression level 0? What I tried to do and describe is to account for a bug in older zlib versions. I didn't want to have alternative refs for every implementation. I actually oppose to that! Alexander _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
