James Almer (12024-10-14): > A new flag AVFILTER_FLAG_SUPPORT_COMMANDS that the user can check to ensure > a call to avfilter_process_command() will not return ENOSYS could be added.
So you mean to have the same information twice in the source code of the filter: once as the process_command callback, once as the flag. Having the same information twice in the source code is a recipe for bugs: unavoidably somebody will update one and not the other. The correct way of doing this would be to add a function in libavfilter. -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".