On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 09:10:05AM +0300, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2024, Niklas Haas wrote:
>
> > > Sorry for not checking this earlier, but PowerPC 32- and 64-bit builds
> > > with AltiVec enabled now fail with:
> > >
> > > src/libswscale/ppc/yuv2yuv_altivec.c: In function
> > > ‘ff_get_unscaled_swscale_ppc’:
> > > src/libswscale/ppc/yuv2yuv_altivec.c:199:33: error: assignment to
> > > ‘SwsFunc’ {aka ‘int (*)(SwsContext *, const unsigned char * const*,
> > > const int *, int, int, unsigned char * const*, const int *)’} from
> > > incompatible pointer type ‘int (*)(SwsContext *, const uint8_t **, int
> > > *, int, int, uint8_t **, int *)’ {aka ‘int (*)(SwsContext *, const
> > > unsigned char **, int *, int, int, unsigned char **, int *)’}
> > > [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> > > 199 | c->convert_unscaled = yv12toyuy2_unscaled_altivec;
> > > | ^
> > > src/libswscale/ppc/yuv2yuv_altivec.c:201:33: error: assignment to
> > > ‘SwsFunc’ {aka ‘int (*)(SwsContext *, const unsigned char * const*,
> > > const int *, int, int, unsigned char * const*, const int *)’} from
> > > incompatible pointer type ‘int (*)(SwsContext *, const uint8_t **, int
> > > *, int, int, uint8_t **, int *)’ {aka ‘int (*)(SwsContext *, const
> > > unsigned char **, int *, int, int, unsigned char **, int *)’}
> > > [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> > > 201 | c->convert_unscaled = yv12touyvy_unscaled_altivec;
> > > | ^
> > > make: *** [src/ffbuild/common.mak:81: libswscale/ppc/yuv2yuv_altivec.o]
> > > Error 1
> >
> > My bad for missing this one. Is there a public way I can test build on
> > different
> > platforms before submitting series? I would have thought that posting it on
> > the
> > ML is enough to trigger FATE runs on all platforms, but I didn't get any
> > email
> > reply to the series.I tested it on several platforms but it seems not any that caught this > > No, there's no such infrastructure for running FATE across the various > (individually driven) instances that voluntarily run tests more or less > frequently, unfortunately. There is some minimal testing hooked up via > patchwork though. This should be expanded. Ideally patchwork should test a broader set but then again, thats how development works, not everything can be caught at some point its more work to catch these things than to just fix it in a 2nd commit. thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Whats the most studid thing your enemy could do ? Blow himself up Whats the most studid thing you could do ? Give up your rights and freedom because your enemy blew himself up.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
