On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Michael Niedermayer
<mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 08:39:00AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> FATE is non-interactive; it should not listen to user commands
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanaga...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> tests/fate-run.sh | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/fate-run.sh b/tests/fate-run.sh
>> index b88730a..7aa5df2 100755
>> --- a/tests/fate-run.sh
>> +++ b/tests/fate-run.sh
>> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ probeframes(){
>>
>> ffmpeg(){
>> dec_opts="-hwaccel $hwaccel -threads $threads -thread_type $thread_type"
>> - ffmpeg_args="-nostats -cpuflags $cpuflags"
>> + ffmpeg_args="-nostdin -nostats -cpuflags $cpuflags"
>
> This is not neccessary and its not how FFmpeg is used by the majority
> of users scripts AFAIK.
>
> I dont mind if fate tests "-nostdin" but it also should test the case
> without "-nostdin" as thats likely how its used most of the time
What does testing without -nostdin add?
Can you give a concrete example of where by applying this patch the
quality/utility
of ffmpeg's FATE environment is being reduced?
I am not so sure that the majority of users' scripts use -nostats either.
Applying the same logic, FATE should test without the -nostats flag as well.
>
> [...]
> --
> Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
>
> The real ebay dictionary, page 1
> "Used only once" - "Some unspecified defect prevented a second use"
> "In good condition" - "Can be repaird by experienced expert"
> "As is" - "You wouldnt want it even if you were payed for it, if you knew ..."
>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
