It seems that my patch didn't get picked up by patchwork :( Did I miss a formatting step?
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 1:40 AM <kevmo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Kevin Wang <kevmo...@gmail.com> > > When the flag AV_CODEC_FLAG_OUTPUT_CORRUPT or AV_CODEC_FLAG2_SHOW_ALL > is set, ignore any out of order POC's as they may still be valid > frames. > > Fixes https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/11190. > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wang <kevmo...@gmail.com> > --- > libavcodec/h264_slice.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/libavcodec/h264_slice.c b/libavcodec/h264_slice.c > index a66b75ca80..fc5a829755 100644 > --- a/libavcodec/h264_slice.c > +++ b/libavcodec/h264_slice.c > @@ -1341,7 +1341,8 @@ static int h264_select_output_frame(H264Context *h) > out_idx = i; > } > if (h->avctx->has_b_frames == 0 && > - ((h->delayed_pic[0]->f->flags & AV_FRAME_FLAG_KEY) || > h->delayed_pic[0]->mmco_reset)) > + // Check if we should ignore the output order and output the frame > + ((h->delayed_pic[0]->f->flags & AV_FRAME_FLAG_KEY) || > h->delayed_pic[0]->mmco_reset || h->avctx->flags & > (AV_CODEC_FLAG_OUTPUT_CORRUPT | AV_CODEC_FLAG2_SHOW_ALL))) > h->next_outputed_poc = INT_MIN; > out_of_order = out->poc < h->next_outputed_poc; > > -- > 2.34.1 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
