>De : ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org> De la part de martin 
>schitter
>Envoyé : jeudi 12 septembre 2024 13:54
>On 12.09.24 13:14, Nicolas Gaullier wrote:
>> The message "Recognize and Ignore" does not make it clear what issue or 
>> grave defect is solved here.
>> I see in the code that fill items are currently recognized as dark metadata 
>> and ignored likewise, but I don't see any issue here.
>> Maybe could you comment a little bit about your intent ?
>
>While developing this DNxUncompressed code I always got lots of this "Dark key 
>..." log messages in the debug output. This kind of output wouldn't be a 
>surprise, if the key belongs to some rare and utterly irrelevant data >box. 
>but in this particular case the key stands for empty "fill" blocks, which are 
>frequently used in various places in MXF files. They are an elementary 
>building block of this container format.
>
>On the muxer side of ffmpegs MXF code 'fill' is known and used in many places, 
>but the demuxer doesn't recognize this element and just always prints these 
>warnings about something "unknown". That's highly irritating and >also 
>inefficient, because 'fill' is used quite frequently e.g. as place holder to 
>align frame data on 256byte boundaries etc.
>
>It's really trivial to fix and I don't see, why we should debate any longer 
>about this obvious flaw instead of just quickly solving the issue.
>
>But if you want, you can rewrite the wording to "Recognize 'fill' in MXF data 
>and suppress output" or whatever you like...

I am not against the idea of the patch: filler items should not be logged as 
dark metadata. I just wanted to check with you that it was indeed the only 
issue.
So it is not a big issue, and I find the patch confusing both because of the 
commit msg and code:
- the commit msg should not claim it "adds support for" filler items: mxf files 
with fillers are already supported/playable.
Maybe just a single line like "avformat/mxfdec: suppress verbose log for 
fillers" ?
- why not using a simple "if" on the av_log rather than inserting a new block 
of code ?

Thank you,
Nicolas

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to