On Wed, 11 Sep 2024, Zhao Zhili wrote:
From: Zhao Zhili <zhiliz...@tencent.com>
put_luma_v_8_4x4_c: 1.0 ( 1.00x)
put_luma_v_8_4x4_neon: 0.0 ( 0.00x)
put_luma_v_8_8x8_c: 3.5 ( 1.00x)
put_luma_v_8_8x8_neon: 0.5 ( 7.00x)
put_luma_v_8_16x16_c: 13.8 ( 1.00x)
put_luma_v_8_16x16_neon: 1.2 (11.00x)
put_luma_v_8_32x32_c: 54.2 ( 1.00x)
put_luma_v_8_32x32_neon: 5.0 (10.85x)
put_luma_v_8_64x64_c: 217.5 ( 1.00x)
put_luma_v_8_64x64_neon: 18.8 (11.60x)
put_luma_v_8_128x128_c: 886.2 ( 1.00x)
put_luma_v_8_128x128_neon: 74.0 (11.98x)
---
libavcodec/aarch64/h26x/dsp.h | 8 +++
libavcodec/aarch64/h26x/qpel_neon.S | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
libavcodec/aarch64/vvc/dsp_init.c | 7 ++
3 files changed, 115 insertions(+)
This doesn't look harmful, and looks like the rest of these functions, so
I guess it's acceptable. Let it be known that I very much dislike the
structure of these functions, but you're adding more in the same style of
the old, so I guess that's ok.
// Martin
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
