Dear Andreas!

Thanks for taking a look.
I'm not familiar with ffmpeg development and it's really hard to figure out the more complex demands and hidden secrets of all the projects tooling and workflow requirements.

On 08.09.24 10:47, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
[...] +++ b/libavcodec/dnxucdec.c

+
+const AVCodecParser ff_dnxuc_parser = {
+    .codec_ids      = { AV_CODEC_ID_DNXUC },
+    .priv_data_size = sizeof(DNxUcParseContext),
+    .parser_parse   = dnxuc_parse,
+};
+
+const FFCodec ff_dnxuc_decoder = {
+    .p.name         = "dnxuc",
+    CODEC_LONG_NAME()"DNxUncompressed (SMPTE RDD 50)",

This shouldn't even compile.

I already fixed this obvious little glitch in a quick reply to michaels review yesterday.

btw: could you please give me an advice, how this kind of trivial corrections should be handled on this list?

Should I just post the individual correction as patch in a followup message or always post the numerated full patch set again or even a squashed variant of the changes for better readability in context?

+    .p.type         = AVMEDIA_TYPE_VIDEO,
+    .p.id             = AV_CODEC_ID_DNXUC,
+    .init           = dnxuc_decode_init,
+    FF_CODEC_DECODE_CB(dnxuc_decode_frame),
+    .p.capabilities = AV_CODEC_CAP_FRAME_THREADS,
+};
\ No newline at end of file

This should be fixed.

O.k. that's easy to solve...

btw: what particular linter or make argument should I use to get this more picky warnings and errors myself without access to fancy CI/CD test reports?

diff --git a/libavcodec/version.c b/libavcodec/version.c
index 27f9432..c3b576a 100644
--- a/libavcodec/version.c
+++ b/libavcodec/version.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ const char av_codec_ffversion[] = "FFmpeg version " 
FFMPEG_VERSION;
unsigned avcodec_version(void)
  {
-    static_assert(AV_CODEC_ID_LEAD         ==   269 &&
+    static_assert(AV_CODEC_ID_LEAD         ==   270 &&
                    AV_CODEC_ID_PCM_SGA      == 65572 &&
                    AV_CODEC_ID_ADPCM_XMD    == 69683 &&
                    AV_CODEC_ID_CBD2_DPCM    == 81928 &&

This is by definition the wrong fix. Instead you should do as the assert
message tells you: Don't insert your new ID in the middle of the list.

well -- that's indeed a real issue!

I needed few attempts to figure out how this somehow works at all, because I'm perhaps to stupid to understand/follow the relevant section in the documentation (https://ffmpeg.org/developer.html#New-codecs-or-formats-checklist):

If I add a new ID somewhere in the relevant section of codec_id.h the LEAD-element position will be shifted in any case. Isn't this the reason, why the minor version number in libavcodec/version.h must be bumped too?

Wherever possible I added changes for DNxUncompressed close to other DNx* entries in alphabetic order, but in codec_id.h and codec_desc.c I placed it at the end of the relevant section immediately before the LEAD-entry to minimize incompatibility.

Please simply show me how this particular issue can be solved in a more desired manner.

Didn't look closely at the rest (but it already seems like there are
many issues).

Please just help me figure out all relevant issues!
I'm really willing to improve my contribution.

thanks!
martin
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to