On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 7:55 PM James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 8/29/2024 2:18 PM, Ramiro Polla wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 7:10 PM James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 8/29/2024 10:40 AM, Ramiro Polla wrote: > >>> Instead of relying on system #ifdefs which may or may not be correct, > >>> detect the POSIX ioctl signature at configure time. > >>> --- > >>> configure | 2 ++ > >>> libavdevice/v4l2.c | 2 +- > >>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/configure b/configure > >>> index 63f0429b02..ebbec49993 100755 > >>> --- a/configure > >>> +++ b/configure > >>> @@ -2524,6 +2524,7 @@ HAVE_LIST=" > >>> opencl_videotoolbox > >>> perl > >>> pod2man > >>> + posix_ioctl > >>> texi2html > >>> xmllint > >>> zlib_gzip > >>> @@ -7158,6 +7159,7 @@ xmllint --version > /dev/null 2>&1 && enable > >>> xmllint || disable xmllint > >>> check_headers linux/fb.h > >>> check_headers linux/videodev2.h > >>> test_code cc linux/videodev2.h "struct v4l2_frmsizeenum vfse; > >>> vfse.discrete.width = 0;" && enable_sanitized > >>> struct_v4l2_frmivalenum_discrete > >>> +test_code cc sys/ioctl.h "int ioctl(int, int, ...);" && enable > >>> posix_ioctl > >> > >> Is this check going to fail for the targets where ioctl_f has request as > >> an unsigned long int? > > > > Yes. This is from config.log: > > > > /tmp/ffconf.S7gHklXc/test.c: In function 'main': > > /tmp/ffconf.S7gHklXc/test.c:2:22: error: conflicting types for > > 'ioctl'; have 'int(int, int, ...)' > > 2 | int main(void) { int ioctl(int, int, ...);; return 0; } > > | ^~~~~ > > In file included from /tmp/ffconf.S7gHklXc/test.c:1: > > /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/sys/ioctl.h:42:12: note: previous > > declaration of 'ioctl' with type 'int(int, long unsigned int, ...)' > > 42 | extern int ioctl (int __fd, unsigned long int __request, ...) > > __THROW; > > | ^~~~~ > > Cool. Should be ok then. Just remove the colon at the end of the check > since test_code() will add one. Some compiler settings like -pedantic > may complain about it, so better safe than sorry.
Thanks. I'll apply without the colon at the end of the check. By the way, the tests for struct_v4l2_frmivalenum_discrete and v4l2_m2m all have the trailing colon as well. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".