Hi Pierre, Tomas, For lossy codestreams, I found a potential problem on the current 9x7 integer IDWT (which will be activated with the +bitexact flag.)
I have confirmed that FFMPEG passes all the test cases without the flag. The problem has been locally solved with the updated code, however, the patch set is not yet ready. (It won't take long) Best, Osamu > 2024/08/22 1:01、Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <p...@sandflow.com>のメール: > > ?On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 8:54?AM Tomas Hardin <g...@haerdin.se> wrote: >> >> man 2024-08-19 klockan 23:03 -0700 skrev p...@sandflow.com: >>> From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <p...@palemieux.com> >>> >>> --- >>> tests/fate/jpeg2000.mak | 129 >> >> I presume you've tested that the frames match the references as >> required. If so then it looks OK to me > > @osamu you checked that all the codestreams decoded within acceptable > limits, right? If so, I will add you as co-author. > > (I have only checked a few of them for accuracy per the spec. I have > checked all of them for memory leaks/crashes.) > >> >> /Tomas >> _______________________________________________ >> ffmpeg-devel mailing list >> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org >> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel >> >> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email >> ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
