Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-07-24 20:44:50) > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 07:11:48PM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > Reorganize the code such that the frame threading code does not call the > > decoders directly, but instead calls back into the generic decoding > > code. This avoids duplicating the logic that wraps the decoder > > invocation and allows receive_frame()-based decoders to use frame > > threading. > > > > Further work by Timo Rothenpieler <t...@rothenpieler.org>. > > --- > > libavcodec/avcodec.c | 9 +- > > libavcodec/avcodec_internal.h | 25 +-- > > libavcodec/decode.c | 40 +++-- > > libavcodec/internal.h | 7 + > > libavcodec/pthread_frame.c | 278 +++++++++++++++++++++------------- > > 5 files changed, 235 insertions(+), 124 deletions(-) > > this (frm your recive_frame branch) breaks:
Then I will need to reintroduce some form of patch 28 - ideally its second iteration split into 3 patches, as then the ownership semantics of slice_damaged is much simpler. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
