On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 at 10:48, Josh Allmann <joshua.allm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 at 12:06, Josh Allmann <joshua.allm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Encoders may emit a buffering period SEI without a corresponding
> > SPS/PPS if the SPS/PPS is carried out-of-band, eg with avcc.
> >
> > During Annex B conversion, this may result in the SPS/PPS being
> > inserted *after* the buffering period SEI but before the IDR NAL.
> >
> > Since the buffering period SEI references the SPS, the SPS/PPS
> > needs to come first.
> > ---
> >
> > Notes:
> >     v2: Updated FATE test refs
> >
> >  libavcodec/bsf/h264_mp4toannexb.c          | 13 +++++++++++++
> >  tests/ref/fate/h264-bsf-mp4toannexb        |  2 +-
> >  tests/ref/fate/h264_mp4toannexb_ticket2991 | 18 +++++++++---------
> >  tests/ref/fate/segment-mp4-to-ts           | 12 ++++++------
> >  4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Ping for review. Looking at the FATE output, this patch fixes a number
> of things - see [1] for details
>
> [1] https://ffmpeg.org//pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2024-July/330964.html

Pasted the wrong link - please see this for a review of the FATE test changes

https://ffmpeg.org//pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2024-July/330912.html
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to