On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 11:34:36AM +0200, Niklas Haas wrote:
> From: Niklas Haas <g...@haasn.dev>
> 
> scale_frame() inconsistently handled the lifetime of `in`. Fixes a
> possible double free and a possible memory leak.
> 
> The new code always has `scale_frame` take over ownership of the input
> frame. I first tried writing this code in a way where the calling code
> retains ownership, but this is nontrivial due to the presence of the
> no-op short-circuit condition in which the input frame is directly
> returned. (As an alternative, we could use av_frame_clone() instead, but
> I wanted to avoid touching the original behavior in this commit)
> ---
>  libavfilter/vf_scale.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

patchset LGTM

thx

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a
revolutionary act. -- George Orwell

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to