On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 1:47 PM Niklas Haas <ffm...@haasn.xyz> wrote:
> > Open questions: > > 1. Is this a good idea, or do the downsides outweigh the benefits? > 2. Is an "advanced configuration" API still needed, in addition to the > quality presets? > Having a sort of preset is a good idea, esp to simplify the ffmpeg cli, but maybe 10 levels is a bit too many, as users will either pick the default, the fastest or the slowest /most of the times/. In either case, I'm afraid the advanced config API is needed, as you'd want to let people tweak and set up the full configuration, since ffmpeg is generally low level IMO. -- Vittorio _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
