On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 08:51:10AM +0100, tim nicholson wrote: > On 31/07/15 17:19, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 05:37:12PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote: > > [...] > >> So in order for the community to continue this, I'd say we probably need > >> to have some help for: > >> > >> - guidelines on the merge strategies > >> - step-by-step on the release process > > > >> - some overview on the sysadmin state (like, what happens with the recent > >> server offers?) > > > > i accepted the 2 offers which noone objected against (on the ML), > > so FFmpeg should > > get 2 boxes that things can be moved to and which should be dependable > > it does need volunteers doing the work. > > Maybe lou, beastd, tim nich, roberto and you would be willing to help > > move things to them > > I am up for assisting where I can, but August is going to be mainly > holiday for me ;) > > > > it was discussed to move things into virtual machines (qemu) for > > higher security, isolation and ease of future moving. >
> If we go kvm etc, prebuilding a base image beforehand that can then be > forked for postfix/Apache/trak etc would be useful. yes > > In fact there are some pre-built images already for some things, e.g > > https://www.turnkeylinux.org/issue-tracking?page=1 has these been build by someone who knows about security ? or would it require a security audit to ensure no auth stuff /session keys / host keys / prng state / whatever is carried over from the public image ? [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB No great genius has ever existed without some touch of madness. -- Aristotle
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
