> On Jun 17, 2024, at 16:45, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 10:03 AM Zhao Zhili <quinkbl...@foxmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Jun 17, 2024, at 15:05, Anton Khirnov <an...@khirnov.net> wrote: >>> >>> Quoting Zhao Zhili (2024-06-17 07:19:26) >>>> From: Zhao Zhili <zhiliz...@tencent.com> >>>> >>>> When thread_count be zero, it will be run on current thread like >>>> !HAVE_THREADS. >>> >>> Other APIs treat zero to mean "auto". >> >> executor don’t detect cpu cores by itself. It’s more low level than >> libavcodec. >> >> Zero thread is zero thread, literally. If we use thread_count one to mean >> run on current thread, how to create a single thread then? > > Whats the point of creating a single thread? Does the main thread ever > do something else in the meantime, or does it just wait for the job > anyway?
Executor as a basic infrastructure should support such usage. The caller don’t need to wait for the job to finish. > > - Hendrik > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
