On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Stephan Holljes <klaxa1...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: >> I have no more remarks on the whole series, I believe it can be applied. >> >> If your public Git tree is ready for pulls, you can do a final rebase and >> send a pull request directly. If not, I can do the same with my tree. >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> Nicolas George > > I just rebased, added a description and made a pull-request. > (My command was: git request-pull master > http://git.klaxa.eu/git/ffmpeg simple_http_server_api_implementation I > hope that's correct?) > > I am currently working on tests to be run with FATE. In that regard, I > want test both: the command line feature and the multi-client API. > Should I test the command line feature like in tests/fate/ffprobe.mak > or test it on the API level? Also: Should I use the existing sample > implementation in doc/examples/ or use the API to construct concrete > tests (probably with fork() and waitpid() or a different form to do > threading to simulate multiple clients)?
I forgot to add: Comparable to libavformat/seek-test.c. > > Regards, > Stephan _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
