On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 6:16 PM Martin Storsjö <mar...@martin.st> wrote:
> On Tue, 21 May 2024, Martin Storsjö wrote:
>
> > Don't benchmark every single combination of widths and heights;
> > only benchmark cases which are squares (like in vvc_mc.c).
> >
> > Contrary to vvc_mc, which increases sizes by doubling dimensions,
> > vvc_alf tests all sizes in increments of 4. Limit benchmarking to
> > the cases which are powers of two.
> >
> > This reduces the number of benchmarked cases from 3072 down to 18.
> > ---
> > tests/checkasm/vvc_alf.c | 11 ++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/checkasm/vvc_alf.c b/tests/checkasm/vvc_alf.c
> > index 9526260598..6dd89bfafc 100644
> > --- a/tests/checkasm/vvc_alf.c
> > +++ b/tests/checkasm/vvc_alf.c
> > @@ -103,7 +103,9 @@ static void check_alf_filter(VVCDSPContext *c, const
> int bit_depth)
> > if (memcmp(dst0 + i * dst_stride, dst1 + i *
> dst_stride, w * SIZEOF_PIXEL))
> > fail();
> > }
> > - bench_new(dst1, dst_stride, src1 + offset, src_stride,
> w, h, filter, clip, vb_pos);
> > + // Bench only square sizes, and ones with dimensions
> being a power of two.
> > + if (w == h && (w & (w - 1)) == 0)
> > + bench_new(dst1, dst_stride, src1 + offset,
> src_stride, w, h, filter, clip, vb_pos);
> > }
> > if (check_func(c->alf.filter[CHROMA],
> "vvc_alf_filter_chroma_%dx%d_%d", w, h, bit_depth)) {
> > const int vb_pos = ctu_size - ALF_VB_POS_ABOVE_CHROMA;
> > @@ -115,7 +117,8 @@ static void check_alf_filter(VVCDSPContext *c, const
> int bit_depth)
> > if (memcmp(dst0 + i * dst_stride, dst1 + i *
> dst_stride, w * SIZEOF_PIXEL))
> > fail();
> > }
> > - bench_new(dst1, dst_stride, src1 + offset, src_stride,
> w, h, filter, clip, vb_pos);
> > + if (w == h && (w & (w - 1)) == 0)
> > + bench_new(dst1, dst_stride, src1 + offset,
> src_stride, w, h, filter, clip, vb_pos);
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > @@ -156,7 +159,9 @@ static void check_alf_classify(VVCDSPContext *c,
> const int bit_depth)
> > fail();
> > if (memcmp(transpose_idx0, transpose_idx1, id_size))
> > fail();
> > - bench_new(class_idx1, transpose_idx1, src1 + offset,
> stride, w, h, vb_pos, alf_gradient_tmp);
> > + // Bench only square sizes, and ones with dimensions
> being a power of two.
> > + if (w == h && (w & (w - 1)) == 0)
> > + bench_new(class_idx1, transpose_idx1, src1 +
> offset, stride, w, h, vb_pos, alf_gradient_tmp);
>
> Note, these tests (all vvc tests) use check_func("name...%dx%d", w, h) -
> while it's common elsewhere to group them up into slightly bigger bundles,
> e.g. only including the width in the function name, assuming that this is
> the level of granularity of actual assembly implementations - e.g. I don't
> think there would be a different codepath implemented for each block
> height.
>
> And it's possible to convey more information about exactly what failed,
> without needing to encode it into the function name - see the
> checkasm_check functions/macro, and e.g. commit
> 8ff4a4a4f4f73c5e276fa0cbe6cd5a148ebdd4ae.
>
Hi Martin,
Thank you for the suggestion.
Tracked with https://github.com/ffvvc/FFmpeg/issues/226
>
> // Martin
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
>
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
