Ok. Didn't know of mkvmerge till now. I have no inclination towards
binary/string tags. I can write them as string tags with mkvmerge
formatting. I just thought parsing binary data directly is better than
parsing a string. But I guess using string tag will be more useful when
parsing mkv from other tools.

If the universality of this change is a problem, then I can hide it behind
a  flag, disabled by default.

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Jerome Martinez <jer...@mediaarea.net>
> wrote:
> > Le 29/07/2015 22:41, Hendrik Leppkes a écrit :
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Sasi Inguva <is...@google.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> @Reimar:
> >>> True about the stream duration being wrong if stream timestamp does not
> >>> start at 0 . I just duplicated the logic to compute the total duration.
> >>> In
> >>> which case, the total duration as it is computed now, is also wrong.
> >>> Printing the durations out in the logs, and then parsing the logs to
> get
> >>> the stream durations would require a big architectural change on my
> side.
> >>> It would be far more convenient if I could get the stream durations
> from
> >>> AVStream object.
> >>>
> >>> FFmpeg does write one seek entry for every cluster in the end of the
> >>> file.
> >>> I could possibly seek to  all the cluster seek entries, then try to
> find
> >>> the last cluster for each track. But in the worst case, even this would
> >>>   translate to demuxing of whole file because, suppose the audio is
> small
> >>> enough to totally fit in one cluster , but the start of the cluster is
> a
> >>> video packet to make sure that I have got the end of the audio stream I
> >>> have to parse the whole cluster. Also it seems very complicated logic
> to
> >>> determine the durations.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Still writing metadata to every single mkv muxed with ffmpeg to fix
> >> your specific use-case seems rather terrible.
> >> We shouldn't be writing extra metadata to serve one special use-case,
> >> just so you can avoid a bit of code shuffling on your end.
> >>
> >> If you can clarify how this could be useful genericall, we might
> >> consider it differently.
> >
> >
> >
> > Lot of people wish to have duration per stream in order to check that the
> > transcoding did not change the duration of each stream (each stream may
> have
> > different duration) or to get some more precise information about the
> file
> > they receive (for example, some people want to reject files which do not
> > have the same video and audio duration).
> >
> > I, as the developer of a tool which read such kind of metadata, am often
> > asked to provide such information per stream for Matroska/WebM files,
> from
> > different users, unfortunately I can not provide specific use case, I can
> > only say it is a common request.
> >
> > But such request is usually binded with more metadata: data rate, count
> of
> > bytes and count of frames. FLV (OP talked about FLV) metadata usually
> > permits to get bit rate per stream (which is the most requested metadata
> on
> > my side, which is not possible to get without additional metadata in
> > Matroska when there is e.g. AVC and DTS-HD, 2 streams with variable
> > bitrate).
> > Additionally, mkvmerge already add such metadata since a couple of
> versions,
> > I guess it is also due to a request from different users.
> >
> > That said, I don't like, as the developer of a tool which will read such
> > added metadata, to have different methods for embedding such metadata.
> > Why not using the same method and values (BPS, DURATION,
> NUMBER_OF_FRAMES,
> > NUMBER_OF_BYTES, _STATISTICS_WRITING_APP, _STATISTICS_WRITING_DATE_UTC
> tags,
> > non binary) as mkvmerge in order to have something which could be useful
> > more generically?
> >
>
> I agree, if anything it should write values compatible to mkvmerge, if
> mkvmerge already writes similar things.
>
> - Hendrik
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to