On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 06:23:02PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 05:32:14PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > ffmpeg | branch: master | Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> | > > Mon Jul 27 04:30:26 2015 +0200| [f4ada6dc3ff7a5c4193d2b30151a48de8e219c94] > > | committer: Michael Niedermayer > > > > ffmpeg: Implement support for seeking relative to EOF > > > > Fixes Ticket227 > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> > > > > > http://git.videolan.org/gitweb.cgi/ffmpeg.git/?a=commit;h=f4ada6dc3ff7a5c4193d2b30151a48de8e219c94 > > --- > > > > doc/ffmpeg.texi | 5 +++++ > > ffmpeg.h | 1 + > > ffmpeg_opt.c | 6 ++++++ > > 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/doc/ffmpeg.texi b/doc/ffmpeg.texi > > index 4d73788..3806a12 100644 > > --- a/doc/ffmpeg.texi > > +++ b/doc/ffmpeg.texi > > @@ -307,6 +307,11 @@ input until the timestamps reach @var{position}. > > > > @var{position} may be either in seconds or in @code{hh:mm:ss[.xxx]} form. > > > > +@item -sseof @var{position} (@emph{input/output}) > > + > > +Like the -ss option but relative to the "end of file". That is negative > > +values are earlier in the file, 0 is at EOF. > > + > [...] > > Also, don't you think a better interface would be to specify a negative > seek value?
iam not sure but feel free to change it [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB While the State exists there can be no freedom; when there is freedom there will be no State. -- Vladimir Lenin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
