2015-07-28 16:04 GMT+08:00 Clément Bœsch <u...@pkh.me>: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:10:12PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: >> 2015-07-27 20:14 GMT+08:00 Clément Bœsch <u...@pkh.me>: >> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 06:13:30PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: >> >> 2015-07-15 21:51 GMT+08:00 Clément Bœsch <u...@pkh.me>: >> >> > On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 01:33:00PM +0200, Sebastien Zwickert wrote: >> >> >> Old videtotoolbox patch rebased and updated to target the new HWAccel >> >> >> API. >> >> >> As VDA is a wrapper of VideoToolbox framework, the changes base vda >> >> >> implementation >> >> >> upon the videotoolbox implementation to factorize common part of code. >> >> >> >> >> >> --- >> >> >> Changelog | 1 + >> >> >> MAINTAINERS | 1 + >> >> >> Makefile | 5 +- >> >> >> configure | 19 +- >> >> >> ffmpeg.h | 2 + >> >> >> ffmpeg_opt.c | 5 +- >> >> >> ffmpeg_vda.c | 134 -------- >> >> >> ffmpeg_videotoolbox.c | 147 +++++++++ >> >> >> libavcodec/Makefile | 12 +- >> >> >> libavcodec/allcodecs.c | 5 + >> >> >> libavcodec/h263dec.c | 3 + >> >> >> libavcodec/h264_slice.c | 4 + >> >> >> libavcodec/mpeg12dec.c | 3 + >> >> >> libavcodec/vda.c | 2 +- >> >> >> libavcodec/vda_h264.c | 154 +--------- >> >> >> libavcodec/vda_internal.h | 33 -- >> >> >> libavcodec/vda_vt_internal.h | 57 ++++ >> >> >> libavcodec/version.h | 2 +- >> >> >> libavcodec/videotoolbox.c | 705 >> >> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> >> libavcodec/videotoolbox.h | 126 ++++++++ >> >> >> libavutil/pixdesc.c | 4 + >> >> >> libavutil/pixfmt.h | 2 + >> >> > >> >> > I tried on iOS (iPhone 6+ so last one unless I'm mistaken) with a 240fps >> >> > footage, and it seems the decode calls take more than 5ms, which seems >> >> > not >> >> > enough. Do you have any idea what could cause this? (I'm running a timer >> >> > after/before avcodec_decode_video*()) >> >> >> >> 1. kVTDecodeFrame_EnableAsynchronousDecompression can make it faster, >> >> but not suitable for sync-style API (avcodec_decode_video*()) >> > >> > not suitable in the sense that it wouldn't work, or it would have >> > undesirable side effects? >> >> It would work, but it would be better and easier if decoder's input >> and output are decoupled. > >> Anyhow, as wm4 said, it's probably not worth the trouble. >> > > Well, if it makes possible for ffmpeg to decode 240fps footage @ 240Hz > that's kind of worth the trouble IMO. The HW decoder seems to be able to > decode frames between 700 to 1100µs, which makes it possible to handle > such material. A factor 5 to 6 with FFmpeg is kind of a problem IMO.
Would you mind to share your 240fps test sample? I'd like to take a benchmark in my own player with async VideoToolbox. https://github.com/Bilibili/ijkplayer _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
