On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 7:35 AM, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 10:39:16 +0200
> Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote:
>
>
>> > +    signal(SIGSEGV, sigterm_handler); /* Segmentation fault (ANSI).     */
>> > +    signal(SIGILL , sigterm_handler); /* Invalid instruction (ANSI).    */
>> > +    signal(SIGFPE , sigterm_handler); /* Arithmetic error (ANSI).       */
>>
>> NO!!!
>>
>> When a crash happens, we want it to happen right there, possibly leave a
>> core. We do not want a signal handler to mess up the remains.
>
> +1
>
>> >  #ifdef SIGXCPU
>> >      signal(SIGXCPU, sigterm_handler);
>> >  #endif
>
> Why?

Not sure; note this was not added by me.
From Kerrisk's "Linux Programming Interface" book,
SIGXCPU is raised when CPU limit is exceeded.
It is a Linux thing, relevant when RLIMIT_CPU is set.

> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to