On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 11:08 AM Stefano Sabatini <stefa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On date Sunday 2024-04-07 16:01:27 +0800, Zhao Zhili wrote: > > > > > On Apr 7, 2024, at 14:16, Anton Khirnov <an...@khirnov.net> wrote: > > > > > > Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2024-04-06 13:25:49) > > >> See > https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2024-February/320849.html > > >> Additionally I do not agree that sorting options by name is the best > > >> way; it should be sorted by what are (believed to be) the most > commonly > > >> used options. > > > > > > +1 > > > > > https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/patch/20240106165246.274472-1-stefa...@gmail.com/ > > > > I have the same consideration in another patch. Maybe group related > > options together than sort whole options. > > This hardly works for the aforementioned reasons, no objective > criteria means that there will be never a consistent way to sort the > options. What happens in practice is that options are added more or > less randomly, which doesn't help readability and discoverability > especially when there are many options. > We have TC now. Oh yes, I completely forgot what is TC. > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
