Le 20 mars 2024 13:45:10 GMT+02:00, "Ignjatović, Lazar (RS)" <lazar.ignjato...@cubic.com> a écrit : > >This message has been marked as Public on 03/20/2024 11:45Z. >On Wednesday, March 20, 2024 12:30 PM Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > >> You're not supposed to guess the link ID from the local address. This is >> counter-sensical. And it's entirely possible to have the same LL address >> assigned to two interfaces (e.g. using a software bridge) anyway. > >You are right about the same LL on multiple interfaces, that’s why the >`sin6_scope_id` is used. For specifying LL address, a scoped address format >should be used to avoid ambiguity.
Yes, the whole point is that LL addresses are ambiguous. > In all other cases, determining the interface ID by address should be ok, No! The only other case is non-LL addressing, which does not require link ID at all. Still -1. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
