On Mar 19, 2024, at 10:21 AM, Kieran Kunhya <kier...@obe.tv> wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 at 15:27, James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com <mailto:jamr...@gmail.com> > wrote: On 3/19/2024 12:20 PM, Kieran Kunhya wrote:From https://github.com/v-novaltd/LCEVCdec " This software is protected by copyrights and other intellectual property rights and no license is granted to any such rights. If you would like to obtain a license to compile, distribute, or make any other use of this software, please contact V-Nova Limited i...@v-nova.com." So you want to include a library that requires ffmpeg users to obtain a licence to compile? Would adding it to the nonfree list be enough? But it's true that most users would not be aware of the aforementioned limitations. This is a slippery slope to adding whatever binary blob. As the decoder is de-facto a binary blob. Yeah, source available but with a prohibition on compilation might as well be a binary blob. Even to be on non-free I'd expect something along the lines of the FDK-AAC license at a minimum. - Cosmin _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
