On 3/11/2024 5:58 PM, Jan Ekström wrote:
This was requested to be added in review.
---
  libavutil/frame.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
  libavutil/frame.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libavutil/frame.c b/libavutil/frame.c
index 46f976a3ed..30db83a5e5 100644
--- a/libavutil/frame.c
+++ b/libavutil/frame.c
@@ -781,29 +781,46 @@ AVFrameSideData *av_frame_side_data_new(AVFrameSideData 
***sd, int *nb_sd,
      return ret;
  }
-int av_frame_side_data_clone(AVFrameSideData ***sd, int *nb_sd,
-                             const AVFrameSideData *src, unsigned int flags)
+AVFrameSideData *av_frame_side_data_add(AVFrameSideData ***sd, int *nb_sd,
+                                        enum AVFrameSideDataType type,
+                                        const AVBufferRef *buf,
+                                        unsigned int flags)
  {
-    AVBufferRef     *buf    = NULL;
-    AVFrameSideData *sd_dst = NULL;
-    int              ret    = AVERROR_BUG;
+    AVBufferRef     *new_buf = NULL;
+    AVFrameSideData *sd_dst  = NULL;
- if (!sd || !src || !nb_sd || (*nb_sd && !*sd))
-        return AVERROR(EINVAL);
+    if (!sd || !buf || !nb_sd || (*nb_sd && !*sd))
+        return NULL;
- buf = av_buffer_ref(src->buf);
+    new_buf = av_buffer_ref(buf);
      if (!buf)
-        return AVERROR(ENOMEM);
+        return NULL;
if (flags & AV_FRAME_SIDE_DATA_FLAG_UNIQUE)
-        remove_side_data(sd, nb_sd, src->type);
+        remove_side_data(sd, nb_sd, type);
- sd_dst = add_side_data_to_set_from_buf(sd, nb_sd, src->type, buf);
+    sd_dst = add_side_data_to_set_from_buf(sd, nb_sd, type, new_buf);
      if (!sd_dst) {
-        av_buffer_unref(&buf);
-        return AVERROR(ENOMEM);
+        av_buffer_unref(&new_buf);
+        return NULL;
      }
+ return sd_dst;
+}
+
+int av_frame_side_data_clone(AVFrameSideData ***sd, int *nb_sd,
+                             const AVFrameSideData *src, unsigned int flags)
+{
+    AVFrameSideData *sd_dst = NULL;
+    int              ret    = AVERROR_BUG;
+
+    if (!src)
+        return AVERROR(EINVAL);
+
+    sd_dst = av_frame_side_data_add(sd, nb_sd, src->type, src->buf, flags);
+    if (!sd_dst)
+        return AVERROR(ENOMEM);
+
      ret = av_dict_copy(&sd_dst->metadata, src->metadata, 0);
      if (ret < 0) {
          remove_side_data_by_entry(sd, nb_sd, sd_dst);
diff --git a/libavutil/frame.h b/libavutil/frame.h
index ce93421d60..a7e62ded15 100644
--- a/libavutil/frame.h
+++ b/libavutil/frame.h
@@ -1021,6 +1021,27 @@ AVFrameSideData *av_frame_side_data_new(AVFrameSideData 
***sd, int *nb_sd,
                                          enum AVFrameSideDataType type,
                                          size_t size, unsigned int flags);
+/**
+ * Add a new side data entry to an array from an existing AVBufferRef.
+ *
+ * @param sd    pointer to array of side data to which to add another entry,
+ *              or to NULL in order to start a new array.
+ * @param nb_sd pointer to an integer containing the number of entries in
+ *              the array.
+ * @param type  type of the added side data
+ * @param buf   AVBufferRef for which a new reference will be made
+ * @param flags Some combination of AV_FRAME_SIDE_DATA_FLAG_* flags, or 0.
+ *
+ * @return newly added side data on success, NULL on error. In case of
+ *         AV_FRAME_SIDE_DATA_FLAG_UNIQUE being set, entries of matching
+ *         AVFrameSideDataType will be removed before the addition is
+ *         attempted.
+ */
+AVFrameSideData *av_frame_side_data_add(AVFrameSideData ***sd, int *nb_sd,
+                                        enum AVFrameSideDataType type,
+                                        const AVBufferRef *buf,
+                                        unsigned int flags);
+
  /**
   * Add a new side data entry to an array based on existing side data, taking
   * a reference towards the contained AVBufferRef.

This also LGTM, but Anton has expressed a dislike for the function signature, preferring instead one that takes ownership of the buffer by taking a pointer to pointer, and clearing it on success. The argument was that the user may not care about keeping a reference to the buffer after it's added to the side data array, but seeing how the very first user in this patch does, I personally think this more appropriate.

If others agree with him then I'll not oppose to it.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to