On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 2:20 PM Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote:
> Andreas Rheinhardt (12024-03-08): > > What maintenance cost and complexity are you referring to? I checked and > > could not find a single commit where one had to fix an ff_get_buffer() > > to ff_thread_get_buffer() because it has been forgotten when the decoder > > has been declared to support frame threading. > > Welcome to the new FFmpeg, where absolute consistency, i.e. catering for > hypothetical mediocre contributors, is more important than easy > optimizations and new approaches. > > And if you do not like it, “shut up, I'm on the TC and I won't recuse”. > > And if you do not like that, “shut up, I'm on the CC too”. > Is this first time I 100% agree on something with my archenemy? > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas George > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
