On Mon, 04 Mar 2024 00:56:02 +0100 Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 12:36:21AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 10:57:43PM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > > Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-03-03 03:49:33) > [...] > > > > > > > Please add the vote options: (I belive this gives the people a more > > > > complete set of choices) > > > > > > Why do you feel you need to bestow all these options upon "the people"? > > > > The point of a vote is to find out what the people want. > > The word democracy means > > government by the people. especially : rule of the majority. : a government > > in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them > > > > For this they need to have the choice. > > > > Normally we discuss disagreements, try to find consensus and move that way > > but here you disregard this and try to push forward with a vote while > > blocking your exact own text in one of the 3 patches that your vote > > would add. > > > > > I hope very much that people even if they agree with the change vote > > against it because what you do here is not how democracy should work. > > I didnt word this well. > what i meant is people should vote in favor of the option > they favor (no matter what that is) > > But if they are presented with a vote that tries to take away their choice > to funnel them into some other option, they should not accept this.
I think there was by now sufficient time for everybody with a dissenting opinion to voice it. As such, +1 to moving on with voting. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
