Quoting Marton Balint (2024-02-20 10:12:34) > We have no means to prove financial interest, because it is not public.
We also have no means to prove that committee members are acting in the project's interest. E.g. if I had no qualms about being dishonest, I could always ask a friend to object to controversial patches in my place, so I wouldn't lose my vote, and nobody could prove it. In the end some things have to be taken on trust. > For practical reasons, using patch authorship is better. Or maybe a more > general solution against bias is somewhat increasing the number of people > in the TC, and removing this rule alltogether. I woould be concerned about making the TC too slow and unwieldy, it already takes a lot of effort to push any decisions through. Keep in mind that during all of its existence it only ever made two decisions, and one of them spent over a year in limbo. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
