Le sunnuntaina 18. helmikuuta 2024, 20.40.14 EET Nicolas George a écrit : > The world is “involves”, its meaning is inherently maximalist.
The wording is very clear (emphasis added): "If the disagreement involves a member of the TC, that member SHOULD recuse themselves from the decision." I trust that you do know the meaning of the auxillary "should". That very definitely and very obviously eliminates any "maximalist" interpretations. > Exactly: you were part of this disagreement, you should recuse yourself. The maximalist interpretation is clearly nonsensical as per reductio ad absurdum. This is a *guideline* or *recommendation*, and obviously it _cannot_ be applied to its logic extreme. Instead Anton, and later rach other TC member will have to each determine for themselves if they are so implicated in the disagreement as to justify recusing themselves. Gyan does not get to dictate it, and neither do you or I. There is no point arguing this further, and I won't. -- レミ・デニ-クールモン http://www.remlab.net/ _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
