On 2024-02-16 02:33 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting Gyan Doshi (2024-02-15 17:47:49)
This patch facilitates a certain productive use of ffmpeg with respect
to processing of live inputs that wasn't possible earlier,
and which currently is being used successfully by multiple people over
the past few weeks.
It applies a processing model already implemented in multiple other
decoders for a number of years. I haven't seen many reports
of issues with them. And surely something being 'a constant source of
issues' would be a lot more than 'subtly broken' as you describe
them.
This reads very much like "I can't be bothered to do it properly and
would rather someone else fix it in the future". Given past experience,
that someone is highly likely to be me, and fixing past architectural
decisions requires a lot more effort than doing things properly in the
first place..
You're the only one who has objected on architectural grounds and
Not true, Andreas has objected as well.
If you are blocking this patch, do acknowledge here within 24 hours and
we can send this to the TC else I'll push it after that period.
I must say I rather dislike this "my way or the highway" attitude. So
yes, I am objecting to the patch in its current form.
Thanks for the clear signal.
I've presented my case to the TC on the ML.
As a TC member who is part of the disagreement, I believe your
participation is recused.
Regards,
Gyan
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
