> On Feb 7, 2024, at 11:27 AM, Lynne <d...@lynne.ee> wrote: > >>> >>> As a compromise, we could start requiring C11 now, and C17 in 7.1. >>> Or does anyone still care about compilers without even c11 support? >>> >> >> How about C11 now and C17 in a year with ffmpeg 8? >> > > Do you have setups and reasons why you can't update them > that don't support C17 or are you speculating?
I don't have any personal reasons why I can't support C17 immediately, but C11 now / C17 in a year seems like an approach more likely to find consensus than C17 immediately (or bumping to C17 in a minor release). It was also roughly the approach proposed in person at FOSDEM. - Cosmin _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
