Quoting Diederick C. Niehorster (2024-01-29 21:41:29) > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 9:10 PM Vittorio Giovara > <vittorio.giov...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 8:22 PM Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> > > wrote: > > > > > > I have yet to see an actual project of "this magnitude" materialize as a > > > proposal. > > > > > > you can suggest one ? > > > > > > > libavscale! > > Not being a regular, this may not count for much. But this sounds like > a great opportunity, lets not pass it up. Projects i have seen on the > mailing list over the last two years or so that i remember and should > be of interest: > - swscale rewrite/update/extension > - deal with the libavdevice situation > - remove postproc > - Nicolas various utility proposals for strings, options, etc > - hell, even a better infrastructure for dealing with incoming patches > and tests surrounding them, using pull requests, automatic CI fate > runs upon incoming pull requests, etc.
The main problem with most of these is not funding, it's lack of agreement on what should be done. In some cases even on basic direction things should move in. The potential issues mentioned in this thread would be extra likely to materialize then. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
