> > > Statements of Work and milestones (by definition) are for features. > > The SoW suggestion/need came from a lawyer that jonatas asked IIUC. > so i can just suggest to put work like what you list above into a SOW like > framework. Or maybe Jonatas can clarify, in case i misunderstood >
My point is that ongoing maintenance can't be split into discrete pieces of work, nor arguably can a given timescale be associated with cleanup. For example YUVJ is difficult, until you remove it and see the bugs you don't know how long it will take. This is not suited to the bounty/SoW methodology. We don't need STF to be funding features, we need maintenance, infrastructure etc which all lends itself to salaried work. Kieran _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
