Jan 24, 2024, 13:30 by an...@khirnov.net: > Quoting Lynne (2024-01-24 13:07:51) > >> Which part of "don't consider as blockers" did you find difficult to >> understand? >> I even added newlines top and bottom for you to laser onto that sentence. >> > > Then why are you mentioning them in a thread specifically about release > blockers. >
Because it was a question about blockers, and I mentioned one. Then I thought I'd share what I'm working on, that someone else might find interesting, and if so, they could either help or express interest? Hence, "would be nice to have". I will not argue that they should be blockers, hence "not a blocker". >> I have started on everything, and two things are finished but need polish, >> one is difficult and needs debugging while the other is more difficult. >> >> And with that release rate attitude, how do you think we can go to our one >> release every few months promise? >> > > I don't understand what you mean by this. > You mentioned half a year, but we planned to make a release every two months under the new release model from 2 years ago. So I just think rather than aiming for half a year, we should aim for a few months, that's all. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
